Volume 14, Issue 6 , Pages 585-591, November 1997
Screening for psychopathology in the clinical practice☆
Abstract
Different instruments are used in clinical practice to assess comorbid psychopathology in addicted individuals. This study is aimed at comparing two of those instruments. In total, 327 heroin- and methadone-addicted individuals were interviewed in three treatment settings and outside treatment. Instruments used are the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The former instrument results in a general measure of severity of psychopathology, while the latter results in categorical DSM-III-R diagnoses. A comparison of the results show, however, that the two types of data do not agree to a large extent. By using the DSM-III-R data as golden standard, it appeared that a part of the psychopathology cases was missed out by the ASI severity measures. The results, that are especially of interest for clinicians using the ASI, are presented for various disorders.
Keywords: addiction, heroin, psychopathology, psychiatric interview, assessment
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ This study could be realized because of grants by the Nationaal Fonds voor de Geestelijke Volksgezondheid, the Municipality of The Hague and the Trustfonds of the Erasmus University. The authors wish to thank the respondents, Liesbeth Vollemans for her valuable help during the fieldwork and the participating treatment settings, Verslavingscircuit Bloemendaal and Centrum Verslavingzorg Zeestraat.
PII: S0740-5472(97)00186-4
© 1997 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Volume 14, Issue 6 , Pages 585-591, November 1997
