Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 39, Issue 3 , Pages 264-271, October 2010

How serious of a problem is staff turnover in substance abuse treatment? A longitudinal study of actual turnover

Received 9 October 2009; received in revised form 24 June 2010; accepted 25 June 2010. published online 02 August 2010.

Abstract 

In the substance abuse treatment field, the annual turnover rate is cited as being anywhere between 19% and 50% (J.A. Johnson & P.M. Roman, 2002; S.L. Gallon, R.M. Gabriel, J.R.W. Knudsen, 2003; H.K. Knudsen, J.A. Johnson, & P.M. Roman, 2003; A.T. McLellan, D. Carise, & H.D. Kleber, 2003). However, no research to date has evaluated these claims by tracking turnover longitudinally using organizational turnover data from substance abuse treatment centers. This research presents the results of a longitudinal study designed to systematically examine actual turnover among counselors and clinical supervisors. Twenty-seven geographically dispersed treatment organizations, serving a wide range of clients in the public and private sector, provided data for the study over a 2-year time span (2008–2009). The annual turnover rate was 33.2% for counselors and 23.4% for clinical supervisors. For both groups, the majority of turnover was voluntary (employee-initiated). Specific reasons for turnover were largely consistent across the two groups, with the most common reason being a new job or new opportunity. The findings are discussed in terms of the unique employment context of substance abuse treatment. Practical recommendations are also discussed to help stem the tide of turnover in the field of substance abuse treatment.

Keywords: Substance abuse counselors, Clinical supervisors, Turnover, Employee retention

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This project described was supported by Award R01DA019460 from the National Institutes on Drug Abuse awarded to Lillian T. Eby. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health. Thanks to Lisa Baranik, Marcus Butts, Lori Ducharme, Sarah Evans, Carrie Hurst, Hannah Knudsen, Aaron Johnson, Charles Lance, and Carrie Owen for their assistance with data collection and analysis.

PII: S0740-5472(10)00136-4

doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.009

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 39, Issue 3 , Pages 264-271, October 2010