Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 39, Issue 3 , Pages 248-254, October 2010

Recovery at work: The relationship between social identity and commitment among substance abuse counselors

University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA

Received 28 October 2009; received in revised form 5 June 2010; accepted 14 June 2010. published online 02 August 2010.

Abstract 

The complex makeup of the substance abuse treatment workforce poses unique challenges to the field. One interesting dynamic is the high rate of counselors who are personally recovering from addictions. Based on social identity theory, it was expected that counselors working in the field of substance abuse treatment who are in recovery themselves will identify more with their profession and report higher professional and organizational commitment. Data from a study of substance abuse counselors from across the United States support the proposed relationship between personal recovery status and professional commitment but not organizational commitment.

Keywords: Substance abuse treatment, Recovery, Social identity theory, Work attitudes, Professional commitment, Organizational commitment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This article is based in part on the first author's master's thesis. This project described was supported by Award R01DA019460 from the National Institutes on Drug Abuse awarded to Lillian T. Eby. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health.

PII: S0740-5472(10)00133-9

doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.006

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 39, Issue 3 , Pages 248-254, October 2010