Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 39, Issue 2 , Pages 180-187, September 2010

Structure, reliability, and predictive validity of the Texas Christian University Correctional Residential Self-Rating Form at Intake in a residential substance abuse treatment facility

  • Sara E. Lowmaster, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, MS 4235, College Station, TX 77843, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Psychology, MS 4235, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Tel.: +1 979 862 5683; fax: +1 979 845 5191.
  • ,
  • Leslie C. Morey, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, MS 4235, College Station, TX 77843, USA
  • ,
  • Kay L. Baker, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Central Texas Treatment Center, CR355, PO Box 488, Granger, TX 76530, USA
  • ,
  • Christopher J. Hopwood, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1116, USA

Received 20 November 2009; received in revised form 16 April 2010; accepted 3 May 2010. published online 05 July 2010.

Abstract 

This study examined the structure and predictive validity of the Texas Christian University Correctional Residential Self-Rating Form at Intake in a court mandated inpatient substance abuse treatment facility (N = 729). Client characteristics such as treatment motivation and psychological and social functioning were examined as predictors of prospective behavioral outcomes including compliance with treatment program rules and guidelines as well as completion of the treatment program. Results suggest that a broad indicator of individuals' pretreatment motivation predicted their ability to complete the program. Treatment noncompliance, as measured by the number of rule infractions committed during the inpatient treatment, was significantly predicted by individuals' propensity to externalize their symptoms. Implications for the effective use of the CR SRF-Intake as a screener for potential treatment problems are discussed as well as possible targets for interventions in substance abuse populations.

Keywords: Treatment, Noncompliance, Assessment, Motivation, Court-mandated

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0740-5472(10)00096-6

doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2010.05.002

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 39, Issue 2 , Pages 180-187, September 2010