Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 38, Issue 2 , Pages 128-140, March 2010

A cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of smoking cessation modified for at-risk smoker subgroups

  • Anil Batra, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 24, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany. Tel.: +49 0 7071/29 82685; fax: +49 0 7071 29 5384.
  • ,
  • Susan E. Collins, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Susan E. Collins is now at the Addictive Behaviors Research Center, University of Washington, Box 351629, Seattle, WA 98195. Tel.: +1 206 832 7885; fax: +1 206 685 1310.
  • ,
  • Martina Schröter, M.A.
  • ,
  • Sandra Eck, M.A.
  • ,
  • Iris Torchalla, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Iris Torchalla is now at the BC Centre of Excellence for Women's Health, E311–4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1. Tel.: +1 604 875 2633.
  • ,
  • Gerhard Buchkremer, M.D.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany

Received 10 March 2009; received in revised form 4 July 2009; accepted 24 August 2009. published online 12 October 2009.

Abstract 

A. Batra, S.E. Collins, I. Torchalla, M. Schröter, and G. Buchkremer (2008) showed that smokers reporting higher levels of nicotine dependence, novelty seeking/hyperactivity, and depressivity (i.e., at-risk smokers) evinced higher rates of posttreatment smoking than smokers reporting lower scores on self-report psychological symptom measures (i.e., lower risk smokers). This study aimed to replicate the smoker subgroups and test the comparative effectiveness of standard pharmacobehavioral smoking cessation versus modified smoking cessation matched to at-risk smokers' needs. On the basis of their self-report responses, adult regular smokers (N = 268) were classified into smoker subgroups. At-risk smokers were randomly assigned to receive the standard or modified treatments; lower risk smokers received standard treatment. Modified treatment produced higher abstinence rates than the standard treatment for depressive smokers but not for other at-risk smokers. Overall, abstinence rates among at-risk smokers receiving modified treatment were not significantly different from those of lower risk smokers; however, abstinence among higher dependence smokers receiving modified treatment decreased at higher rates than among lower risk smokers.

Keywords: Cigarette smoking, Nicotine dependence, Behavioral intervention, Smoker subtypes, Client–Treatment matching

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0740-5472(09)00146-9

doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2009.08.003

Refers to erratum:

  • A cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of smoking cessation modified for at-risk smoker subgroups , 03 December 2010

    Anil Batra, Susan E. Collins, Martina Schröter, Sandra Eck, Iris Torchalla, Gerhard Buchkremer
    Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment March 2011 (Vol. 40, Issue 2, Page 214)

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 38, Issue 2 , Pages 128-140, March 2010