Journal Home
Search for

Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 328-334 (December 2009)


View previous. 4 of 18 View next.

Measures of cognitive functioning as predictors of treatment outcome for cocaine dependence

Travis H. Turner, Ph.D.abcCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Steven LaRowe, Ph.D.bc, Michael David Horner, Ph.D.bc, Janice Herron, Ph.D.b, Robert Malcolm, M.D.b

Received 24 November 2008; received in revised form 4 March 2009; accepted 15 March 2009. published online 27 April 2009.

Abstract 

Amlodipine is a calcium-channel antagonist with neuropharmacological properties believed to be protective against cerebral hypoperfusion, microinfarcts, and excitoxic cell death. Based on its pharmacological properties, we hypothesized that amlodipine would be associated with improved attention, processing speed, memory, and executive functioning at treatment follow-up in 84 cocaine-dependent individuals enrolled in a 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of amlodipine. We also hypothesized that better cognitive functioning at baseline would be associated with reduced cocaine use (negative urine drug screens) and longer treatment retention (last session attended). Results indicated that amlodipine produced no measurable benefit in cognitive functioning. Percent perseverative errors on Wisconsin Card Sorting Test was negatively correlated with treatment retention (n = 84, r = −.350, p < .01). No other findings were significant. Thus, cocaine-dependent individuals who repeated mistakes and benefited less from corrective feedback on a problem-solving task discontinued treatment earlier. Notably, no other cognitive measures predicted treatment outcome. The observed relationship implicates the relevance of executive functioning to treatment outcome for cocaine dependence.

a Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

b Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

c Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, Suite 307 Clinical Sciences Bldg, MSC 606, Charleston, SC 29425-6060, USA.

 This investigation was supported by National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Drug Abuse (RO1-DA11454).

PII: S0740-5472(09)00036-1

doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2009.03.009


View previous. 4 of 18 View next.