Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 256-265, October 2009

Comparative treatment and mortality correlates and adverse event profile of implant naltrexone and sublingual buprenorphine

  • Albert Stuart Reece, M.B.B.S., F.R.A.C.G.P., F.R.C.S. (Ed.), F.R.C.S. (Glas.), M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationSouthcity Family Medical Centre, 39 Gladstone Rd., Hillgate Hill, Queensland 4101, Australia. Tel.: +61 738444000; fax: +61 738444015.

Southcity Family Medical Centre and University of Queensland Medical School, Queensland 4101, Australia

Received 30 June 2008; received in revised form 8 February 2009; accepted 2 March 2009. published online 27 April 2009.

Abstract 

There is increasing interest in the use of implantable naltrexone as a new treatment for opiate dependence. This center has been one of the leaders in this form of treatment in Australia and has recently completed a registry-controlled review of our mortality data. As part of the study of the safety profile of this therapy, we were interested to review both the treatment correlates of previously presented mortality data and of adverse events. A total of 255 naltrexone implant therapy (NIT) and 2,518 buprenorphine (BUP) patients were followed for 1,322.22 and 8,030.02 patient-years, respectively. NIT patients had significantly longer days in treatment per episode (mean ± standard deviation, 238.32 ± 110.11 vs. 46.96 ± 109.79), total treatment duration (371.21 ± 284.64 vs. 162.50 ± 245.76), and mean treatment times but fewer treatment episodes than BUP (all p < .0001). Serious local tissue reaction or infection each occurred in 1% of 200 NIT episodes. These data show that NIT economizes treatment resources without compromising safety concerns.

Keywords: Naltrexone implants, Buprenorphine, Mortality, Serious adverse events, Treatments

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Work was conducted at Southcity Family Medical Centre. This work is the work of ASR in its entirety.

 Conflicts of interest: Naltrexone implants were sold to some patients through this clinic for use in their treatment on campus.

PII: S0740-5472(09)00028-2

doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2009.03.008

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 256-265, October 2009