Journal Home
Search for

Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 321-330 (April 2009)


View previous. 11 of 14 View next.

The Important People Drug and Alcohol interview: Psychometric properties, predictive validity, and implications for treatment

William H. Zywiak, Ph.D.abCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Charles J. Neighbors, Ph.D.c, Rosemarie A. Martin, Ph.D.b, Jennifer E. Johnson, Ph.D.d, Cheryl A. Eaton, M.A.b, Damaris J. Rohsenow, Ph.D.be

Received 17 January 2008; received in revised form 18 July 2008; accepted 10 August 2008. published online 06 October 2008.

Abstract 

Research with the Important People instrument has shown that social support for abstinence is related to alcohol treatment outcomes, but less work has been done on the role of network support in drug treatment outcomes. A drug and alcohol version of the Important People instrument (IPDA) was developed and administered to 141 patients in residential treatment for cocaine dependence. Three components were found, all with acceptable internal consistency: (a) substance involvement of the network, (b) general/treatment support, and (c) support for abstinence. These components and three fundamental network characteristics (size of daily network, size of network, and importance of the most important people) were investigated as correlates of pretreatment and posttreatment alcohol and drug use. The general/treatment support component and network size were inversely related to pretreatment days using drugs, whereas network substance involvement positively correlated with pretreatment drinking frequency. Size of the daily network predicted less drinking, less drug use, and less problem severity during the 6 months after treatment, whereas general/treatment support and support for abstinence did not predict outcome. Network substance involvement decreased for patients who stayed abstinent but not for those who later relapsed. Results suggest that increasing the number of people the patient sees daily while replacing substance-involved with abstinent-supportive people may improve treatment outcomes. Treatment programs may use the IPDA to identify clients most likely to benefit from changes in their social networks.

a Decision Sciences Institute, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Providence, RI 02906, USA

b Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA

c Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, Lifespan, Providence, RI 02903, USA

d Dept. of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA

e Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI 02903, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Decision Sciences Institute, P.I.R.E., 1005 Main St., Suite 8120, Pawtucket, RI 02860, USA. Tel.: +1 401 729 7505 ext 2102; fax: +1 401 729 7506.

PII: S0740-5472(08)00123-2

doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.08.001


View previous. 11 of 14 View next.