Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 242-248 , March 2008

Drug court treatment for methamphetamine dependence: Treatment response and posttreatment outcomes

  • Patricia Marinelli-Casey, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 1640 South Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA. Tel.: +1 310 445 0874x310; fax: +1 310 312 0538.
    • ,
  • Rachel Gonzales, M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA
    • ,
  • Maureen Hillhouse, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA
    • ,
  • Alfonso Ang, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
    • ,
  • Joan Zweben, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • East Bay Community Recovery Project, Hayward, CA, USA
    • ,
  • Judith Cohen, Ph.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • East Bay Community Recovery Project, Hayward, CA, USA
    • ,
  • Peggy Fulton Hora, J.D.

      Affiliations

    • Superior Court of California, Hayward, CA, USA
    • ,
  • Richard A. Rawson, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA
    • ,
  • Methamphetamine Treatment Project Corporate Authors

      Affiliations

    • Acknowledgments detail Corporate list.

Received 3 November 2006 ,Revised 7 March 2007 ,Accepted 5 April 2007.

References 

  1. Belenko S. Research on drug courts: A critical review. The National Centre on Addiction and Substance Abuse, Columbia University; 1998;
  2. Belenko S. Diverting drug offenders to treatment courts: The Portland experience. In:  Terry C editors. In the early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1999;p. 1–18
  3. Belenko S. Research on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update. The National Centre on Addiction and Substance Abuse, Columbia University; 2001;
  4. Brecht ML, Greenwell L, Anglin MD. Methamphetamine treatment: Trends and predictors of retention and completion in a large state treatment system (1992–2002). Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;29:295–306
  5. Center for Substance Abuse Research . Dramatic increase in national treatment admissions for methamphetamine coincides with increase in criminal justice referrals. CESAR FAX. Vol. 15, Issue 22. College Park, MD: University of Maryland; 2006, June;
  6. Cooper CS. 1997 Drug court survey report: Executive summary. Washington, DC: Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project, American University and Justice Programs Office; 1997;
  7. Cretzmeyer M, Sarrazin MV, Huber DL, Block RI, Hall JA. Treatment of methamphetamine abuse: Research findings and clinical directions. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2003;24:267–277
  8. Farabee D, Prendergast M, Cartier L. Methamphetamine use and HIV risk among substance-abusing offenders in California. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2002;34:295–300
  9. Gunter TD, Black DW, Zwick J, Arndt S. Drug and alcohol treatment services effective for methamphetamine abuse. Annuals of Clinical Psychiatry. 2004;16:195–200
  10. Hser Y-I, Evans E, Yu-Chuang H. Treatment outcomes among women and men methamphetamine abusers in California. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;28:77–85
  11. Hser Y-I, Yu-Chuang H, Chou C-P, Anglin MD. Longitudinal patterns of treatment utilization and outcomes among methamphetamine abusers: A growth curve modeling approach. Journal of Drug Issues. 2003;33:921–938
  12. Huber A, Ling W, Shoptaw S, Gulati V, Brethren P, Rawson RA. Integrating treatment for methamphetamine abuse: A psychosocial perspective. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 1997;16:41–50
  13. Huddleston CW. In: Drug courts: An effective strategy for communities facing methamphetamine. Bureau of Justice assistance bulletin. Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice; 2005;p. 1–15
  14. Maglione M, Chao B, Anglin D. Correlates of outpatient drug treatment drop-out among methamphetamine users. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2000;32:221–228
  15. Maglione M, Chao B, Anglin D. Residential treatment of methamphetamine users: Correlates of drop-out from the California Alcohol and Drug Data System (CADDS), 1994–1997. Addiction Research. 2000;8:65–79
  16. McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grissom G, et al. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1992;9:199–213
  17. National Association of Drug Court Professionals . Defining drug courts: The key components. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice; 1997;
  18. Obert JL, McCann MJ, Brethen P, Marinelli-Casey P, Rawson RA. The Matrix Model of outpatient substance abuse treatment: History and description. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2000;32:157–165
  19. Rawson R, Shoptaw S, Obert JL, McCann M, Hasson A, Marinelli-Casey P, et al. An intensive outpatient approach for cocaine abuse: The Matrix Model. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1995;12:117–127
  20. Rawson RA, Huber A, Brethen P, Obert J, Gulati V, Shoptaw S, et al. Status of methamphetamine users 2–5 years after outpatient treatment. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2002;21:107–119
  21. Rawson RA, Marinelli-Casey P, Anglin D, Dickow A, Frazier Y, Gallagher C, et al. A multi-site comparison of psychosocial approaches for the treatment of MA dependence. Addiction. 2004;99:708–717
  22. Rawson RA, McCann MJ, Flammino F, Shoptaw S, Miotto K, Reiber C, et al. A comparison of contingency management and cognitive–behavioral approaches for stimulant-dependent individuals. Addiction. 2006;101:267–274
  23. Roll JM, Huber A, Sodano R, Chudzynski J, Moynier E, Shoptaw S. A comparison of five reinforcement schedules for use in contingency management-based treatment of methamphetamine abuse. Psychological Record. 2006;56:67–81
  24. Simpson DD. A conceptual framework for drug treatment process and outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2004;27:99–121
  25. Simpson DD, Joe GW. A longitudinal evaluation of treatment engagement and recovery stages. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2004;27:89–97
  26. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive, online analysis of the concatenated 1992–2002 TEDS data set. accessed 6/2/2006; available online at http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/SAMHDA
  27. Turner S, Longshore D, Wenzel S, Deschenes E, Greenwood P, Fain T, et al. A decade of drug treatment court research. Substance Use and Misuse. 2002;37:1489–1527

 The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the agency.

PII: S0740-5472(07)00109-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.005

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 242-248 , March 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution