Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 239-254 , April 2007

Drug treatment services for adult offenders: The state of the state

  • Faye S. Taxman, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23220, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Virginia Commonwealth University, 923 West Franklin Ave., Suite 501, Richmond, VA 23220. Tel.: +1 804 828 8012; fax: +1 804 827 1843.
    • ,
  • Matthew L. Perdoni, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23220, USA
    • ,
  • Lana D. Harrison, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Drug and Alcohol Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716-2582, USA

Received 26 September 2006 ,Revised 30 November 2006 ,Accepted 25 December 2006.

References 

  1. Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring System . 2000 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring annual report. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice; 2003;
  2. Beck AJ. State and federal prison population tops one million. (Publication No. NCJ-182446) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2000;
  3. Beck AJ. What do we know about jails at the national level? Presentation at the Jail Reentry Roundtable. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2006;
  4. Belenko S. The challenges of integrating drug treatment into the criminal justice process. Albany Law Review. 2000;63:833–872
  5. Belenko S, Peugh J. Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmates. Drug and Alcohol Dependency. 2005;77:269–281
  6. Bureau of Justice Administration . Residential substance abuse for state prisoners (RSAT) program. (Publication No. NCJ-206269) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2005;
  7. Bureau of Justice Statistics . Prisoners in 1989. (Publication No. NCJ-122716) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1990;
  8. Bureau of Justice Statistics . Drugs and jail inmates. (Publication No. NCJ-130836) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1991;
  9. Bureau of Justice Statistics . Drugs and crime facts, 1994. (Publication No. NCJ-154043) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1995;
  10. Bureau of Justice Statistics . Federal drug offenders, 1999, with trends, 1984–1999. (Publication No. NCJ 187285) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2001;
  11. Bureau of Justice Statistics . Bureau of Justice Statistics correctional surveys. In: (The Annual Probation Survey, National Prisoner Statistics, Survey of Jails, and The Annual Parole Survey) as presented in Correctional Populations in the United States, Annual, Prisoners in 2004 and Probation and Parole in the United States, 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2004;
  12. Butzin CA, Scarpitti FB, Nielsen AL, Martin SS, Inciardi JA. Measuring the impact of drug treatment: Beyond relapse and recidivism. Corrections Management Quarterly. 1999;3:1–7
  13. Chandler RC, Fletcher BW. Principles of drug abuse treatment for criminal justice populations: A research-based guide. Rockville, MD: NIH Publication No. 06-5316; 2006;
  14. Coweles EL, Castalleno TC, Gransky LA. Boot camp drug treatment and aftercare interventions: An evaluation review. (Publication No. NCJ-155062) Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice; 1995;
  15. Craddock SG, Rounds-Bryant JL, Flynn PM, Hubbard RL. Characteristics and pretreatment behaviors of clients entering drug abuse treatment: 1969 to 1993. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1997;23:43–59
  16. Duffee DE, Carlson BE. Competing value premises for the provision of drug treatment to probationers. Crime & Delinquency. 1996;42:574–592
  17. Etheridge RM, Hubbard RL, Anderson J, Craddock SG, Flynn P. Treatment structure and program services in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behavior. 1997;11:244–260
  18. Farabee D, Hser Y, Anglin DM, Haung D. Recidivism among an early cohort of California's proposition 36 offenders. Criminology and Public Policy. 2004;3:563–584
  19. Farabee D, Prendergast ML, Cartier J, Wexler HW, Knight K, Anglin MD. Barriers to implementing effective correctional treatment programs. The Prison Journal. 1999;79:150–162
  20. Flynn PM, Craddock SG, Hubbard RL, Anderson J, Etheridge RM. Methodological overview and research design for the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1997;11:230–244
  21. Glaze LE, Palla S. Probation and parole in the United States, 2004. (Publication No. NCJ-210676) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2005;
  22. Goldkamp JS, White MD, Robinson JB. Do drug courts work: Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues. 2001;31:27–72
  23. Gottfredson DC, Najaka S, Kearley B, Rocha CM. Long-term effects of participation in the Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court: Results from an experimental study. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 2006;2:67–98
  24. Harlow CW. Profile of jail inmates, 1996. (Publication No. NCJ-164620) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1998;
  25. Harrell A, Cavanagh S, Roman J. Findings from the evaluation of the D.C. Superior Court Drug Intervention Program: Final report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 1998;
  26. Harrison L. The revolving prison door for drug-involved offenders: Challenges and opportunities. Crime & Delinquency. 2001;47:462–485
  27. Harrison LD, Martin SS. Residential substance abuse treatment (RSAT) for state prisoners: Compendium of initial and process evaluation. (Publication No. NCJ-187099) Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice; 2001;
  28. Harrison LD, Martin S. Residential substance abuse treatment for state prisoners: Implementation lessons learned. (Publication No. NCJ-195738) Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice; 2003;
  29. Hser Y, Grella CE, Hubbard RL, Hsieh SC, Fletcher BW, Brown BS, et al. An evaluation of drug treatment for adolescents in 4 US cities. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2001;58:689–695
  30. Hubbard R, Marsden M, Rachal J, Harwood H, Cavanaugh E, Ginzburg H. Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press; 1989;
  31. Inciardi JA, Martin SS, Butzin CA. Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release from prison. Crime & Delinquency. 2004;50:88–107
  32. Inciardi JA, Martin SS, Butzin CA, Hooper RM, Harrison LD. An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues. 1997;27:261–278
  33. Karberg JC, James DJ. Substance dependence, abuse, and treatment of jail inmates, 2002. (Publication No. NCJ-209588) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2005;
  34. Kish L. Survey sampling. New York: Wiley; 1965;
  35. Langan PA, Levin DJ. Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. (Publication No. NCJ-193427) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2002;
  36. Lockwood D, Inciardi JA, Surratt H. CREST Outreach Center: A model for blending treatment and corrections. In:  Inciardi JA,  Fletcher BW,  Delany P,  Horton AM editor. The effectiveness of innovative approaches in the treatment of drug abuse. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; 1997;
  37. Lowenkamp CT, Latessa EJ. Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement. Criminology and Public Policy. 2005;4:263–290
  38. Lowenkamp CT, Latessa EJ, Holsinger AM. The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs?. Crime & Delinquency. 2006;52:77–93
  39. MacKenzie DL. Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime & Delinquency. 2000;46:457–461
  40. Martin SS, Butzin CA, Saum CA, Inciardi JA. Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release to aftercare. The Prison Journal. 1999;79:294–320
  41. Mumola CJ. Substance abuse and treatment of adults on probation, 1995. (Publication No. NCJ-166611) Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1998;
  42. Mumola CJ. Substance abuse and treatment, state and federal prisoners, 1997. (Publication No. NCJ-172871) Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1999;
  43. National Association of Drug Court Professionals . Defining drug courts: The key components. Washington, DC: Drug Court Program Office, Office of Justice Programs; 1997;
  44. National Institute of Justice . Drug Use Forecasting: Drugs and crime 1990 annual report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice; 1991;
  45. National Institute on Drug Abuse . Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide(NIH Publication No. 99-4180). Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1999;
  46. Office of National Drug Control Policy . http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy/gov/publications/factsht/drugdata/index.html2003;
  47. Peters RH, Murrin MR. Evaluation of treatment-based drug courts in Florida's first judicial circuit. Tampa, FL: Department of Mental Health, Law and Policy. Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of Southern Florida; 1998;
  48. Petersilia J, Turner S. Intensive probation and parole. In:  Tonry M editors. Crime and justice: A review of research. vol. 17:1993;p. 281–335
  49. Roman PM, Johnson JA. Adoption and implementation of new technologies in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2002;22:1–8
  50. SEARCH . Drug court monitoring, evaluation, and management information systems: National scope needs assessment. (Publication No. NCJ-195077) Washington DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance; 2003;
  51. Sherman LW, Gottfredson D, MacKenzie DL, Eck J, Reuter P, Bushway S. Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. Washington DC: Office of Justice Programs; 1997;
  52. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Brown BS. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1997;11:294–307
  53. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Fletcher BW, Hubbard RL, Anglin MD. A national evaluation of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1997;56:507–514
  54. Simpson DD, Wexler HK, Inciardi JA. Drug treatment outcomes for correctional settings: Part 1. The Prison Journal. 1999;79:291–293
  55. Simpson DD, Wexler HK, Inciardi JA. Drug treatment outcomes for correctional settings: Part 2. The Prison Journal. 1999;79:381–383
  56. Stephan JJ, Karberg JC. Census of state and federal correctional facilities, 2000. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2003;
  57. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies . National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS): 2000. Data on substance abuse treatment facilities. 2002;DASIS Series: S-16, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 02-3668, Rockville, MD
  58. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies . National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS): 2004. Data on substance abuse treatment facilities. 2005;DASIS Series: S-28, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 05-4112, Rockville, MD
  59. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies . Results from the 2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings. 2005;NSDUH Series H-28, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 05-4062, Rockville, MD
  60. Taxman FS. Supervision—Exploring the dimensions of effectiveness. Federal Probation. 2002;66:14–27
  61. Taxman FS, Bouffard JA. The importance of systems issues in improving offender outcomes: Critical elements of treatment integrity. Justice Research and Policy. 2000;2:9–30
  62. Taxman FS, Bouffard JA. Treatment inside the drug court: The who, what, where, and how of treatment services. Journal of Substance Use and Misuse. 2002;37:1665–1688
  63. Taxman FS, Bouffard J. Drug treatment in the community: A case study of study integration. Federal Probation. 2003;1–23
  64. Taxman FS, Bouffard J. Substance abuse counselors' treatment philosophy and the content of treatment services provided to offenders in drug court programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2003;25:75–84
  65. Taxman FS, Bouffard J. Explaining drug treatment completion in drug courts. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 2005;42:23–50
  66. Taxman, F.S., Cropsey, Young, Wexler. (in press). Assessment and referral practices in correctional agencies: Results from a national survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior.
  67. Taxman FS, Marlowe D. Risk, needs, responsivity: In action or inaction?. Crime & Delinquency. 2006;52:3–6
  68. Taxman FS, Young DW, Wiersema B, Rhodes A, Mitchell S. The National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices survey: Mutilevel survey methods and procedures. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2007;32:225–238
  69. Taylor B, Fitzgerald N, Hunt D, Reardon W, Brownstein H. ADAM preliminary 2000 findings on drug use and drug market: Adult male arrestees. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 2001;
  70. Wilson DJ. Drug use, testing, and treatment in jails. (Publication No. NCJ-179999) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2000;
  71. Young DW, Dembo R, Henderson CE. A national survey of substance abuse treatment for juvenile offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2007;32:255–266

PII: S0740-5472(07)00017-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.019

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 239-254 , April 2007

Article Tools