Is the drug court model exportable? The cost-effectiveness of a driving-under-the-influence court

References 

1. American Council on Alcoholism (ACA) . Drug courts website: Drug court challenges. http://www.aca-usa.org/challenges.htm2005;(Accessed June 24, 2005)
2. Banks D, Gottfredson DC. Participation in drug treatment court and time to rearrest. Justice Quarterly. 2004;21:637–658
3. Beitel GA, Sharp MC, Glauz WD. Probability of arrest while driving under the influence of alcohol. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1975;36:109–116
   • MEDLINE
4. Belenko S. Research on drug courts: A critical review and update. New York, NY: The National Center on Addition and Substance Abuse at Columbia University; 2001;
5. Breckendridge JF, Winfree LT, Maupin JR, Clason DL. Drunk drivers, DWI ‘Drug Court’ treatment, and recidivism. Who fails?. Justice Research and Policy. 2000;2:87–105
6. Dechenes EP, Turner SF, Greenwood PW. Drug court or probation? An experimental evaluation of Maricopa County's Drug court. The Justice System Journal. 1995;18:55–73
7. Fell J. Repeat DWI Offenders in the United States. Washington, DC: National Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic, Safety Administration Traffic; 1995, February;Tech No. 85
8. Finn P, Newlyn AK. Miami's "Drug Court": A different approach. Program focus. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice; 1993;
9. Goldkamp JS, White MD, Robinson JB. Context and change: The evolution of pioneering drug courts in Portland and Las Vegas (1991–1998). Law and Policy. 2001;23:141–170
10. Goldkamp JS, White MD, Robinson JB. Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues. 2001;31:27–72
11. Goldkamp JS, Weiland D. Assessing the impact of Dade County's felony drug court. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice; 1993;
12. Gottfredson DC, Kearley BW, Najaka SS, Rocha CM. The Baltimore City drug treatment court: 3-Year self-report outcome study. Evaluation Review. 2005;29:42–64
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
13. Granfield R, Eby C, Brewster T. An examination of the Denver Drug Court: The impact of a treatment-oriented drug offender system. Law and Policy. 1998;20:183–202
14. Huddleston CW, Freeman-Wilson K, Boone DL. Painting the current pictures: A national report card on drug courts and other problem solving court programs in the United States, Vol. 1, No. 1. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute; 2004;
15. Judicial Council of California , The California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs . Drug Court Partnership Act of 1998, Chapter 1007, Statutes of 1998 Final Report. 2002;
16. Lapham SC, Smith E, C'De Baca J, Chang I, Skipper BJ, Hunt WC. Prevelance of psychiatric disorders among persons convicted of driving while impaired. Archives of General Psychiatric. 2001;58:943–949
17. MacDonald JM, Morral AR, Raymond B, Eibner C, (forthcoming) Evaluation review.
18. Marlowe DB, De Matteo DS, Festinger DS. A sober assessment of drug courts. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 2003;16:153–157
19. Mays GL, Ryan SG, Bejarano C. New Mexico creates a DWI drug court. Judicature. 1997;81:122–125
20. Meithe TD, Lu H, Reese E. Reintegrative shaming and recidivism risks in drug court: Explanation for some unexpected findings. Crime and Delinquency. 2000;46:522–541
21. National Highway Transportation Safety Authority (NHTSA) . Initiatives to address impaired driving. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/alcohol/IPTReport/FinalAlcoholIPT-03.pdf2003;(Accessed June 24, 2005)
22. National Highway Transportation Safety Authority (NHTSA) . Traffic safety facts: 2003 data. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/TSF2003/809767.pdf2005;(Accessed June 24, 2005)
23. Nichols J. Treatment versus deterrence. Alcohol Health and Research World. 1990;14:44–51
24. Nichols J, Ross H. The effectiveness of legal sanctions in dealing with drinking drivers. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving. 1990;6:33–60
25. NPC Research Inc. , Administrative Office of the Courts Judician Council of California . California drug courts: A methodology for determining costs and avoided costs. Phase 1: Building the methodology. 2002;http://www.npcresearch.com/Files/CADC%20Phase%201%20Final%20report.pdf2002;(Accessed April 25, 2006)
26. Peck RC. Evaluating DUI Program impact in Quasi-Experiments. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving. 1994;10:207–215
27. Quinlan KP, Brewer RD, Siegel P, Sleet DA, Mokdad AH, Shults RA, et al. Alcohol-Impaired Driving Among US Adults, 1993-2003. American Journal of Preventative Medicine. 2005;28:346–350
28. Roberts-Gray C. Process evaluation: SHORT program, 1993–1994. Austin, TX: Resource Network; 1994;
29. Ross HL. Are DWI sanctions effective?. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving. 1992;8:61–69
30. Rottman D, Casey P. Therapeutic Jurisprudence an the Emergence of Problem Solving Courts. National Institute of Justice Journal. 1999, July;12–19
31. Sechrest DK, Shichor D, Artist K, Briceno G. The Riversides County Drug Court: Final research report for the Riverside County Probation Department, Riverside County, California. San Bernardino, CA: California State University, Criminal Justice Department; 1998;
32. Stewart K, Ellingstad VS. Rehabilitation countermeasures for drinking drivers. Surgeon General's workshop on drunk driving. Background papers (pp. 234–246) Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 1989;
33. Taylor D, Miller TR, Cox KL. Impaired driving state cost fact sheets: United States. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/alcohol/impaired_driving_pg2/US.htm2002;(Accessed June 24, 2005)
34. Taxman F, Piquero A. On preventing drunk driving recidivism: An examination of rehabilitation and punishment approaches. Journal of Criminal Justice. 1998;26:129–143
35. Truitt L, Rhodes WM, Hoffman NG, et al. Evaluating treatment drug courts in Kansas City, Missouri and Pensacola, Florida: Executive summary. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates; 2002;
36. Yu J. Punishment and alcohol problems: Recidivism among drinking–driving offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice. 2000;28:261–270